When and whether we go to mars depends on technology, money and what we consider an acceptable risk


Bold : Main Idea
Manhattan project or the Apollo program “we’re closer to mars in terms of the technology required to do it today then we were to the moon when president Kennedy set that goals in 1961. We are far closer.
We aren’t closer to paying for a mars trip, though and it’s the expense that killed the grand plants of the past.The Apollo moon landings cost about $140 billion in today’s dollars. Exprets assume a realistic journey to mars would cost at least that much : a fully loaded plan put forward under president George H.W Bush had a price tag of $450 billion. But NASA’s annual budget for all human spaceflight is around nine billion dollars. To get mars before 2040s would take a lot of money and a president with Kennedy like commitment. During the moon race with the sovier Union. NASA got more than 4 percent of the federal budget: now it gets about half a percent. If there were a truly a “ Mars race” with China, say, that might help, but the chinnese don’t apprear in a rush to get there.
When and whether  we go to mars doesn’t just depend on technology and money. It depends on what we consider of an acceptable level of risk. Advocates of an early landing say that NASA is too risk averse, that true explores accept the possibility of failure or death, that the people who first tried to reach the poles or cross the oceans knew they might not make it and often didn’t. NASA could send people to mars a lot sooner if it didn’t worry so much about whether tey’s arrive alive and eventually make it home.
At the end of Gerstenmaier’s news conference in Utah, a local reporter stood up. He was 49 years old, he said, and he just want to know one thing : would he live to see a man on mars ?
“ yes ‘” Gersteinmaier  said. He Hesitated for a moment and then added: “’man’ may be the wrong word . You will see a Human Being.”


Subject
Verb
Object/clause
We
Are
closer to mars in terms of the technology
We
were
to the moon
We
are
far closer
We
aren’t
closer to paying for a mars trip
The Apollo moon
landings
cost about $140 billion in today’s dollars
NASA
got
more than 4 percent of the federal budget
the chinnese

don’t
appear in a rush to get there.
we
go
to mars doesn’t just depend on technology and money.
we
consider
of an acceptable level of risk
NASA
could
send people to mars a lot sooner
it
didn’t
worry so much about whether they’s arrive alive and eventually make it home
He
was
49 years old
he
Said
and he just want to know one thing
You
will see
a Human Being



 



Komentar

Postingan Populer